It's made of heavy material just as you expect from Dickies. It is well crafted just as you expect from Dickies.

First thing I wanted to know when I got the shorts whether they have the hook and eye closure as the description says or the button closure as the photo shows. The answer, it's button closure.
I was planning to use these shorts for bicycle riding and I have been using, and am still using, Sportif stretch shorts over the cycling bib shorts but they are not long enough(inseam 7") to cover the whole length of the bib shorts. So I was half expecting the "Dickies stretch shorts" to be just as stretchable as Sportif but they are not. The stretch property of these shorts are nearly non-existent(and only in one direction). But it wasn't a disappointment. This material has its own rights. Besides that, you can't compare $20,- shorts to a $60.- shorts. If you haven't tried, you should own at least one pair of Sportif. They last forever and are worth the price.
The fit is somewhat weird. Until you actually wearing them, you don't know what "Fits below the waist" means, and maybe you'll see why some people are describing them to be little under-sized. The very top of the waist is wide then smaller at little below the belt line(sign of it can be seen in the photo). In short these shorts are designed for people with beer belly for the comfort. In my case, there's a big gap between the top of the shorts and my belly. Because I ordered one size larger based on the review the gap is even bigger. Using a belt solves the problem but it creates folds of extra material under the belt.
Another short coming. The zipper is made of heavy gauge brass, as you expect from Dickies, but short. About 1.5" shorter than other pants I have. So, If you have a habit of pulling one out to pee without unbutton you will have to change your habit of it. Because it doesn't open low enough so you'll have to unbutton the closure.
The inseam length is listed as 11" but it's more like 12"(11-3/4" measured), on 32" waist shorts.
So far, I've worn them for a week and gave them a couple of washes but no sign of shrinkage. Despite some of the shortcomings I still like these shorts and am planning to give them a hell of abuse.

These are great. 11 in fits normally. The 13th will make you look like a raver from the 1990s. There are some other ones that are 9 in I think if you want to look like a 1970s basketball player

These shorts are durable like the Dickie cargo work pants I have. I love the pocket feature that allows me to put my phone inside. The shorts seems to run a bit long for me since I am not a tall guy. 10” would be perfect instead of 11”. Overall, I am satisfied with these shorts and may get another one in a different color.

Color and length is good as a 11” seam pants. I would use it for work but only problem it isn’t as stretch as a “stretch” pants usually is. I usually wear a 29/30 when a pants is “stretch” but not these. I would have to wear a size 32 for this pants.

Good quality material and stitching. Normally wear a 36-38. Got this in a 40, they fit like smaller sizes in other brands. For example, they don't fall down without a belt, even though they are about two sizes bigger than what I wear in most brands. I don't plan or working more than 5 more years until retiring. Hard on clothes (aircraft mechanic) never the less I expect these will last me until I no longer need them!